Compute
is the new
infrastructure
of civilization

Our future depends
on compute

TALPs apply everywhere compute runs

 

TALPs improve compute throughput and predictability — slashing power consumption while accelerating the speed of execution.

In lab tests, TALPs have reduced energy consumption by as much as 91%.

Matrix Multiply

2989521605225929123566Energy (Ws)1611151920Core countOptimal core: 19Energy: 331.44 Ws
Energy Saved
0.00%
at 19 cores
Serial
3,241.39 Ws
baseline · 1 core
Optimized
331.44 Ws
at optimal core

TALPs Optimize Software for the Environment the Software Runs In

Software doesn't run in a vacuum - it runs on real hardware with real-world constraints. TALPs dynamically optimize execution for the specific environment in which software operates, improving performance, reducing energy consumption, or achieving the optimal balance between the two.

Everyone's Focused on
Making Hardware Faster.
Few Have Focused on
Optimizing How Software
Actually Runs.

For decades, the industry has focused on: Smaller transistors, Higher clock speeds, More cores, Faster interconnects

But software execution itself — the way processors step through machine code — has remained fundamentally unmanaged.

Processors execute instructions.

They do not understand execution pathways.

TALPs do.

Compute has expanded. Optimization has not.

Five fundamentals principals that make TALPs a foundation for modern compute.

Ubiquitous by Design

TALPs apply everywhere compute runs.

From Cloud to Edge. From Watts to Milliwatts.

Compute is expanding across every layer of modern systems. Cloud infrastructure, industrial equipment, field systems, and personal devices all rely on software execution.

  • Hyperscale + enterprise workloads
  • Industrial plants + real-time systems
  • Field equipment + rugged edge compute
  • Personal devices + local execution
World map
Cloud Server
Industrial System
Field Equipment
Personal Device
Edge Node
IoT Device
Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3

Cross-Industry Impact

Any domain. Same advantage.

Every vertical is becoming computational.

As software becomes the control plane for the physical world, performance and efficiency become strategic—across mission-critical and specialized systems.

  • Defense + national security systems
  • Enterprise + infrastructure software
  • Biotech + genomics + scientific computing
  • AI + IoT + robotics + edge networks

No New Hardware

No silicon redesign required.

Optimize software. Not silicon.

TALPs improve execution on your target architecture—without a chip redesign, fabrication cycle, manufacturing ramp, or ecosystem migration.

  • No new hardware development cycle
  • No new manufacturing or supply chain risk
  • No platform fragmentation for users
  • Ship improvements as software updates
Software over silicon — no hardware redesign required
Serial vs parallel execution pathways

Beyond Parallelization

More than parallelism.

Whole-program optimization: serial + parallel.

TALPs don’t just “add threads.” They optimize the serial path and extract safe parallel execution where it exists—improving throughput and predictability.

  • Optimize serial bottlenecks
  • Extract safe parallel execution pathways
  • Control synchronization only where necessary
  • Improve predictability and utilization

Automatic TALPification

Adoption without retraining.

No parallel programming required.

Teams shouldn’t have to rewrite systems around new models or train on niche frameworks. TALPification is automatic—software stays software.

  • No kernel rewrites or framework lock-in
  • No training teams on new parallel models
  • Works with existing code structure
  • Clear, auditable transformations
Adoption without retraining — no parallel programming required

Different layers of optimization

Compiler and TALPdistinct roles, stronger together

A compiler optimizes how code is translated and emitted for a target machine. A TALP optimizes which execution pathway matters, how that pathway behaves with real input, and how it should run to meet a real goal such as speed, energy, memory, or cost.

Compiler lane

How can this code be emitted efficiently for the machine?

1
Source Code
2
IR / Analysis
3
Machine Code / Binary

What it does

  • Syntax and semantic analysis
  • IR transforms and code generation
  • Inlining, vectorization, scheduling
  • Register allocation and binary emission

Optimizes

Optimizes code translation and machine-facing efficiency

TALP lane

Which pathway will execute, how will it behave, and what is the best way to run it?

1
Source Code + Inputs + Hardware + Goal
2
TALP Decomposition + Prediction
3
Parallelization / Execution Strategy

What it does

  • Execution pathway decomposition
  • Input-sensitive loop and behavior analysis
  • Prediction of time, energy, memory, and speedup
  • Goal-driven execution and parallelization strategy

Optimizes

Optimizes pathway behavior and workload-specific execution

CompilerTALP

How they work together

TALP decides what to optimize.The compiler decides how to emit it efficiently.

TALP makes the execution pathway explicit, predicts runtime behavior for real workloads, and chooses a strategy aligned to real goals. The compiler then turns that strategy into efficient executable code for the target machine.

TALP determines what pathway matters and how it should run

The compiler emits efficient executable code for that strategy

Together they improve both runtime behavior and machine-level efficiency

Compiler
Optimizes emitted code
TALP
Optimizes runtime strategy
Together
Optimize both execution behavior and machine efficiency

TALP + Compiler relationship

A stacked view of optimization

TALP operates above the compiler layer, reasoning about application behavior and execution pathways. The compiler operates below that, translating code efficiently for the processor. Together they form a practical optimization stack.

APP
LEVEL
TALP
Application
Decompose
Execution Graph
Pathway Analysis
Execution Paths

Models how software actually behaves and which execution pathway matters.

CODE
LEVEL
COMPILER
Code
LLVM IR
Optimization Passes
Machine Code

Transforms program code into efficient instructions for the target machine.

Target execution layer

Processor / Machine

The compiler emits for the machine. TALP shapes how the application should execute on that machine.

TALP layer

Application-aware decomposition, pathway selection, and execution planning.

Compiler layer

IR generation, code transformation, and machine-targeted emission.

System outcome

Better execution strategy above, efficient code generation below.

Two layers of optimization

Decision and Execution

TALP operates as an execution intelligence layer above the compiler. It determines how a program should run. The compiler then translates that decision into efficient machine-level execution.

TALP

Execution Intelligence Layer

Decides what will run, how it behaves, and what matters for this execution.

Understands Inputs
Models Execution Paths
Chooses Strategy
Hardware-aware
Software-aware
Data-aware
Controls parallelization & resources
TALP-informed execution strategy

COMPILER

Execution Translation Layer

Turns code into efficient instructions for the target machine.

Code
IR
Machine Code

Target execution

Processor / Machine

TALP decides how your program should run.

The compiler makes that decision executable.

TALP in the software lifecycle

TALP fits across the lifecycle

TALP is not a competing replacement for compilers, profilers, analytics, or deployment tooling. It acts as an execution intelligence layer that works across the lifecycle and makes the existing stack smarter.

TALP

Execution Intelligence Layer

Understands software, hardware, data, and goals — then informs optimization decisions across the lifecycle.

Pathway-aware
Compiler-friendly
Analytics-compatible
Runtime-informed
Code

Source, algorithms, architecture

Build

Toolchains, packaging, integration

Compile

IR, codegen, machine targeting

Test & Profile

Validation, tracing, performance data

Deploy

Targets, environments, rollout paths

Runtime

Execution, control, optimization

What this means

TALP works with the lifecycle — not against it

Instead of replacing existing tools, TALP adds a higher-order layer of execution intelligence that can inform code analysis, optimization choices, compilation strategy, deployment context, and runtime behavior.

Core message
TALP doesn't replace your stack.
It helps the stack execute better.

Works with compilers

TALP informs execution strategy while compilers still handle code translation and machine-level emission.

Works with profiling and analytics

TALP complements observability, tracing, and performance analysis by turning execution behavior into actionable optimization decisions.

Works with optimization tooling

TALP does not replace existing optimization tools. It adds a pathway-aware intelligence layer above them.

Works at runtime

TALP helps determine how software should execute for real hardware, real inputs, and real goals.

TALPs + Automatic Parallelization

Serial code vs TALPified execution.

The “after” version is not about rewriting everything—it’s about declaring the pathway and constraints. The runtime finds safe parallelism automatically.

Outcome
Parallelism without hand-threading
Declare dependencies. The scheduler does the rest.
Outcome
Deterministic + auditable execution
Enforce ordering where it matters.
Before
Before: Manual serial flow
Work is locked behind a loop. Ordering is implicit. Parallelism is hard.
before.c
Serial
After
After: TALPified pathway + constraints
Declare dependencies. Auto-schedule parallelism. Keep deterministic barriers.
after.c
TALPified

Pseudo-code for clarity. Actual integration details depend on workload and environment.

Self-Aware Compute

When Compute
Becomes Self-Aware

Software no longer blindly executes instructions. It observes the pathways it actually runs, understands how input data changes execution, and adapts in real time to achieve the best possible outcome.

Observe

Sees the execution pathways your software actually takes.

Understand

Learns how data, hardware, and runtime conditions shape behavior.

Adapt

Adjusts execution dynamically to pursue the best outcome in real time.

Execution State

Observing pathways. Adapting in real time.

Live

Self-Aware Compute

When Compute Becomes Self-Aware

Software no longer blindly executes instructions. It observes the pathways it actually runs, understands how input data changes execution, and adapts in real time to achieve the best possible outcome.

Observe

Sees the execution pathways your software actually takes.

Understand

Learns how data shape, hardware, and runtime conditions affect behavior.

Adapt

Adjusts execution dynamically to pursue the best outcome in real time.

Interactive Optimization

Move the goals. Watch the system adapt.

Adjust input size, core availability, timing targets, energy goals, and cost assumptions. Then compare optimized output against the serial, unoptimized baseline.

Recommended cores
10
Most efficient core count found: 14
Energy savings
77.6%
Compared with the 1-core serial baseline
Predicted runtime
5.69s
Within time goal
Predicted energy
1,232 Ws
Outside energy goal
Predicted cost
$1.89
Based on your power cost factor
Predicted impact
517 g CO₂e
1,047 mL cooling water equivalent
Live readout
Optimization result preview
Runtime adaptive
Runtime
5.69s / goal 10.0s
Serial: 38.0s
Energy
1,232 Ws / goal 400 Ws
Serial: 5,510 Ws
Cost
$1.89
Serial: $7.27
Best for time goal6 cores
Best for energy goal15 cores
Serial baseline time38.0s
Serial baseline energy5,510 Ws
Serial baseline cost$7.27